Audio
Michelle Roger: 'The L Word Gen Q'
ReFramed by
Attitude Foundation3 seasons
Episode 21
27 mins
Michelle Roger - writer, artist, photographer, model - joins the team to discuss TV show The L Word Gen Q.

Meet Michelle Roger on this week's episode of ReFramed!
Michelle is a writer, artist, photographer and model who is passionately pushing for better representation of people with disability in those industries. She has also been using her platform on social media to run a project called "Up and Dressed", which explores fashion and disability.
Joined by Steph and Jason, Michelle helps us analyse the show 'The L Word Gen Q', which features Jillian Mercado. The show is a sequel series to 'The L Word' which aired from 2004 to 2009 and amassed a huge fan base. Similar to its predecessor, this series follows the lives of a queer group of friends who live in Los Angeles, California.
Here at ReFramed, we absolutely LOVE Jillian Mercado - and we think you'll love this episode!
0:00
coming up on reframed along with this
0:03
week's special guest Michelle Roger
0:05
today we'll be discussing the L word gen
0:08
queue
0:09
bloody amazing and our lives aren't like
0:11
what's being depicted on screen but
0:14
they're like the most important parts of
0:16
representation I think you know they do
0:19
these things we have sex and I'm like I
0:22
don't know the last time I saw that
0:24
represented on screen
0:26
[Music]
0:30
hey
0:32
welcome back to reframed the podcast
0:34
that reframes her disability is
0:36
portrayed in film and TV I'm your host
0:39
Jason clymo and today I have the
0:41
wonderful Stephanie Dowell with me as my
0:43
co-host along with this week special
0:45
guest Michelle Roger
0:47
today we'll be discussing the L word gen
0:49
Q
0:50
bloody amazing but before we do let's
0:52
say Hello to Michelle and learn a little
0:54
bit more about them so welcome to the
0:56
podcast Michelle did you just want to
0:58
start off by letting us all know a bit
1:00
about you and what you do
1:02
I'm Michelle
1:04
um I'm a bit
1:06
of an Eclectic person
1:09
artist photographer model
1:13
um I'd do a bit of everything really so
1:16
it's sort of
1:17
a lot of it depends on what my body's
1:20
doing so at times I'm focusing on my
1:23
writing other times I'm focusing more on
1:25
photography doing
1:28
um
1:29
artist Retreats things like that
1:32
um or yeah modeling as well so it's sort
1:34
of I'm a little bit all over the shop
1:35
with what I do
1:37
um and I do a lot of work online
1:40
particularly on Instagram so I've run a
1:42
project now for seven years called up
1:44
and dressed which is basically exploring
1:47
fashion and disability but also just a
1:49
celebration of actually getting
1:50
physically up and dressed when you're
1:52
particularly chronically ill and it's
1:54
quite a challenge to be getting up and
1:56
dressed you know even just to get out of
1:57
bed most days it can be a you know a
1:59
real challenge but to get up and dressed
2:01
and celebrate that as something to do
2:02
and it sort of morphed into a much
2:04
larger project over the years
2:06
and gone from just taking photos in my
2:09
laundry
2:11
um or in my backyard with my chooks too
2:13
on the runway at Melbourne fashion week
2:15
so it's sort of yeah it's so good it's
2:17
been like a wild ride that I never
2:19
expected and here I am at 49 doing all
2:22
sorts of things so
2:24
and talking with my hand I bloody love
2:26
it it's so good though can I quickly ask
2:29
like do you have and I know I shouldn't
2:31
do this as a fellow model I hate it when
2:32
people ask this but surely you've done
2:35
so many amazing things do you have like
2:37
a favorite moment from your modeling
2:39
career so far
2:41
oh it's so tricky question really
2:46
I think
2:47
look to be honest I think last year when
2:50
I did the underground Runway
2:52
it was a favorite moment because it was
2:55
the first time
2:57
I'd been on a major Runway that actually
3:00
felt inclusive and diverse
3:04
authentically so the first time I'd been
3:07
particularly behind the scenes more so
3:09
more so than any visual aspect but
3:12
behind the scenes was a real sense
3:15
that
3:17
it wasn't a tokenistic effort like
3:19
everyone from stylist to makeup artist
3:22
to the crew behind scenes wanted it to
3:26
be authentically diverse I went to
3:29
authentically inclusive
3:31
and just welcoming like really
3:35
I yeah I think
3:37
that was
3:39
it for me
3:41
that was the moment yeah it was just
3:43
because it's so rare I think
3:46
yeah yeah yeah and we need more of that
3:49
and you know hats off to Melbourne
3:51
Fashion Week
3:52
I've done a little bit of stuff with
3:53
them too which is awesome and they are
3:55
amazing and they are doing the work
3:57
behind the scenes so
3:58
um you know all we can hope is that it
4:00
creates more opportunities for models
4:01
more opportunities for disabled
4:03
creatives behind the scenes as well like
4:06
we want disabled like directors
4:09
um you know stylists hair and makeup
4:11
everyone so
4:13
um yeah I love that I think that's so
4:15
true like for me audiences are so smart
4:19
nowadays they really know you can really
4:21
tell when something is that genuine
4:24
authentic representation and you can you
4:26
can see it build from the ground from
4:29
the initial seed along the along the
4:31
entire I guess artistic process
4:34
um or creative process
4:37
um you know it's richer it's Fuller it's
4:39
it just is a deeper representation
4:42
um and I think that's the same when it
4:44
comes to film and television
4:46
um you can really tell when that genuine
4:47
representation is happening behind the
4:49
scenes as well as in front of the camera
4:52
um I guess for you from your perspective
4:55
why is it so important that we see more
4:58
of this out there and audiences are
5:00
exposed to more authentic and genuine
5:03
representation of disability
5:04
particularly on screen I think it's both
5:06
for disabled people themselves and for
5:09
the general Community as well because I
5:11
think
5:12
I know myself I became really unwell in
5:16
my early 30s I'm 49 now so it's been
5:19
nearly two decades up in crook
5:21
there was such Limited
5:24
anything that wasn't pity depressing
5:28
horrible you know every movie that came
5:30
out you know where you killed yourself
5:32
rather than
5:34
continued Life as a disabled person like
5:36
that was essentially it and then you got
5:38
an Oscar for it and whatever
5:40
there was you know no no hope for the
5:45
future no sense of possibilities or
5:47
anything like that so
5:49
but so much of our culture the way we
5:52
think about the world around us the way
5:54
we think about the people that are in it
5:55
is framed by what we see on TV what we
5:59
see in our movies what we see in our
6:01
advertising all of it and we see it over
6:03
and over again and as disabled people we
6:06
internalize that as much as The Wider
6:08
Community does And if every
6:09
representation we get is just these
6:12
pity horrible narratives about our
6:16
existence or or the inspirational book
6:19
that we get as well wait
6:21
it doesn't give us
6:24
any sense of I know hope or possibility
6:27
for the future or how our lives can be
6:30
and I think that's particularly
6:32
important for young kids to be able to
6:33
see you know what's their future going
6:36
to hold and their value and their place
6:38
and
6:39
in society what they can achieve as
6:42
someone newly disabled
6:44
you know I used to work in neurological
6:47
rehab before I became unwell so I used
6:51
to see a lot of people who'd had new new
6:53
Strokes or brain injury things like that
6:57
and the change in life and what the
7:00
future held for that again what we see
7:02
what we're seeing in our movies and TV
7:05
was so incredibly negative
7:07
that's what people think the only future
7:09
can possibly be and then the people
7:11
around us internalize that as well and
7:14
they their role around us is depicted by
7:18
Hollywood as these savior roles or where
7:21
the burden they have to care for or
7:25
and that's not what reality is and what
7:27
our lives are and I look around at all
7:29
the people that I've been lucky enough
7:31
to meet and get to know the disability
7:32
community
7:34
and our lives aren't like what's being
7:36
depicted on screen you know they're
7:39
incredibly diversed and nuanced and
7:42
wonderful and it's not that things
7:44
aren't hard at times or
7:46
depressing or things like that but
7:48
there's this whole other world of joy
7:50
and
7:51
I know life like we have lives we don't
7:55
just it's at all sad bubble in the
7:57
corner you know yeah and I think as well
8:00
like you know
8:02
I think a lot of the time when there is
8:04
representation of marginalized
8:06
communities it's like the most palatable
8:09
version of that marginalized community
8:11
so it's like a white person that is
8:15
heterosexual
8:18
um and cisgender
8:20
but then they're disabled and then
8:22
there's still like a bunch of like
8:23
crappy tropes that are probably like
8:25
thrown upon them too most of the time
8:27
but I think it's really interesting to
8:29
unpack the fact that it's like
8:30
intersectionality is still something
8:32
that's not done very well at all
8:35
um we'll talk about this later because
8:38
you know probably the L word is an
8:41
exception to the rule there but
8:43
in general you know there's
8:46
nowhere near enough representation when
8:48
there is representation it's usually
8:50
played by non-disabled people as well
8:52
and then when there is representation
8:54
it's usually like I've said you know the
8:57
most stereotypically palatable
9:00
um you know not intersectional not like
9:02
multi-complex version of you know a
9:06
disabled person being shown
9:08
um and that's a huge pity because it's
9:11
like you know that's just not even a
9:13
real person most of the time like like
9:15
you've said Michelle it's like
9:17
we live you know interesting complicated
9:21
complex lives and we're not just
9:24
disabled we have a lot of other things
9:27
going on in our lives like you know a
9:29
lot of us work a lot of us are you know
9:31
pursuing our own kind of careers or
9:33
Hobbies or whatever it is and
9:36
you know to just kind of show a group of
9:39
people in this completely
9:40
two-dimensional way
9:42
is
9:44
I think you know we spoke about it in
9:45
another episode but it's just inaccurate
9:47
which is wrong like we should actually
9:49
be striving for better accuracy in the
9:53
way that we actually represent people
9:54
anyway
9:56
um but two it's super harmful as you've
9:58
you know really said really really well
10:01
earlier like the way that it people are
10:03
represented is the way that we think
10:05
about ourselves and the way that I think
10:07
others think about us so
10:12
let's get on to analyzing The L Word gen
10:15
queue so to kick us off Steph did you
10:18
just want to give us a bit of a synopsis
10:21
with this show we're returning to the L
10:24
word which was a groundbreaking series
10:26
for its portrayal of the lgbtqi
10:30
um plus Community back in the early
10:32
2000s so the L word generation Q which
10:35
is the new show the new revamp show uh
10:38
reacquaintance us with original
10:40
characters bet chain and else as they
10:43
continue navigating the trials and
10:45
tribulations of life and love with a
10:49
whole new generation of diverse queer
10:51
characters
10:52
um particularly
10:54
um making special mention of the
10:56
character of Maribel
10:57
um who is played by actress Jillian
10:59
Mercado and Jillian like her character
11:02
Maribel is actually a power chair user
11:05
that lives with muscular dystrophy so
11:09
from me and my perspective as a female
11:14
power chair user I am super super
11:18
excited by Jillian's portrayal of
11:20
Maribel um but let's go to Michelle
11:23
first
11:25
um Michelle what are your thoughts on on
11:27
how generation Q has handled disability
11:31
uh I'm another power chair user and I'm
11:34
equally excited because it's just so
11:37
rare to see a power chair user
11:40
in these contexts like it's just you
11:43
know it's I realized by the end of
11:46
watching it how much
11:49
I've needed to see a character
11:52
like that
11:55
and I
11:56
and I almost don't care if it's got
11:58
faults because I'm so starved for that
12:01
kind of representation
12:03
that it's just I could feel myself like
12:07
at the start I was a bit like not quite
12:09
sure
12:10
like
12:11
I hope it gets you know more lines more
12:14
lines please more character development
12:16
and then because I was watching it so
12:18
quickly and it was happening so quickly
12:20
it was I could feel myself getting
12:23
excited by seeing this character
12:26
just little Snippets of life
12:29
where it's obvious that Jillian's had a
12:32
say
12:34
in the character and just things there's
12:38
a little scene
12:39
it's early on
12:41
um she's sitting at the table after the
12:43
oh can we do spoilers yeah God yeah yeah
12:46
yeah
12:48
after the wedding's blowing up and Finn
12:51
came in and yeah
12:53
sitting at the table and all the
12:55
presents are there
12:56
and she goes to get a whisk just a whisk
12:59
off the table it's like a nothing sort
13:01
of moment
13:03
and
13:05
now I'm gonna lose his name
13:07
the boyfriend Monica Micah goes to reach
13:11
for it and she's like no I will tell you
13:14
if I need you to do that and it's just
13:16
like yes get it yeah
13:20
it is such a nothing small moment
13:24
but so much of life I go and I
13:28
particularly notice when I'm out not so
13:30
much at home with people who know me but
13:33
you go to get something and someone is
13:35
instantly going to help you to do it
13:37
without asking and it's just a tiny
13:40
moment of
13:42
reality and I was just like
13:45
they're like the most important parts of
13:48
representation I think and like like
13:51
you've said most likely that was because
13:53
they had genuine casting I'm gonna throw
13:56
this stuff in a minute because Steph's
13:57
like our resident nerd who does all the
13:59
research to see like what what other
14:01
kind of cast and crew were involved that
14:03
were also disabled and I love it
14:06
um but you know there may have been like
14:09
a writer with disability as well but if
14:12
not that was purely due to the fact that
14:14
they cast Jillian in that role and
14:16
Jillian had that knowledge because she
14:19
has the lived experience so she could
14:20
bring that to the show and that creates
14:24
moments like like you had whilst
14:26
watching it that creates moments like
14:29
that for the audience and that is what
14:31
makes shows work when they actually have
14:33
genuine casting and it's not some person
14:36
who's like gone to a rehab center and
14:38
done this really superficial
14:40
like research where like
14:43
literally you can tell that they just
14:45
probably did a lap and spoke to a few
14:47
people who probably Starstruck because
14:48
it was like Eddie Redmayne or someone
14:50
like that came through and they didn't
14:52
actually get real you know in-depth
14:55
amazing information I mean I'm
14:56
speculating here but the way that those
14:58
kind of portrayals generally work out I
15:01
think we can deduce that like genuine
15:04
representation and genuine casting
15:06
almost always like trumps that so
15:09
Steph do you know if there was any other
15:12
tidbits exciting things of behind the
15:15
scenes
15:17
um I'm not I'm not aware of any any
15:20
other people with disability behind the
15:23
scenes necessarily I did read some
15:25
interviews with Jillian and
15:28
um she spoke about how she was uh you
15:31
know the writers and that would reach
15:32
out to her and discuss with her
15:35
um which is obviously great because she
15:36
could bring that lived experience to the
15:39
role and I'm she wouldn't have it any
15:41
other way
15:42
um again it would be I know we spoke
15:45
about this on another episode you know
15:46
it would be nice if as an actress she
15:49
didn't have to also necessarily you know
15:53
consult or provide that perspective but
15:56
the thing is
15:57
you know when you are building a
15:59
character when an actress or an actor is
16:02
building a character they do bring their
16:05
own experience to the table and they do
16:07
consult so I guess you know that that is
16:10
there as well you know it's not an
16:12
unusual
16:13
um or ex you know um exclusive
16:17
um thing for an actress to do but
16:20
um what I you know what I loved most
16:24
about the character and this is what
16:27
we've sort of already touched on was
16:29
she had agency she was her own person
16:31
she had a job she was in a relationship
16:34
I get like I don't know if we're going
16:37
straight I'm going straight to the sex
16:38
scene because that
16:41
that was
16:42
like I almost wanted to cry and this is
16:45
really it's really sad that that you
16:48
know small moment you know it was just
16:51
like a short scene that had such an
16:54
impact I can imagine if I had seen
16:56
something like that when I was a
16:58
teenager growing up or in my more
17:01
formative years like it would have had
17:04
such an impact on how I saw myself and
17:07
what you know how I thought other people
17:10
should see me as well
17:12
um so that that was really I've never
17:15
seen anything really like that done in a
17:19
positive way as well I know there has
17:21
been a
17:23
other portrayals out there but it's
17:26
sometimes done in like a weird not
17:29
necessarily in a loving relationship
17:32
kind of way
17:34
um you know that again like the
17:35
character has agency and choice and she
17:38
she knows what she wants and I think
17:42
even there was one small little moment
17:44
where she like moves his hand like when
17:47
they're in bed together like to wear and
17:49
it's just yeah it was just so so well
17:52
done
17:53
um again this is the kind of stuff that
17:55
I want to see so much more of because
17:57
again it shows not just people with
18:00
disabilities themselves but the like
18:02
wider society that this is what happens
18:05
this is exactly what this is how people
18:08
with disability live you know they do
18:11
these things we have sex it's not yeah
18:14
and like we have sex and most of us know
18:17
what we want when we're having sex and
18:19
that's something that needs to be
18:21
portrayed a lot more
18:23
so yeah I love that and she was so clear
18:26
from the outset like she's as he's
18:28
carrying her up the stairs she's like
18:30
you can't break me like you know just
18:33
and it's just that it was also as you
18:36
say it was she had agency she knew what
18:38
she wanted
18:39
there was it was a built up relationship
18:43
that had come to the point it was like
18:45
the other characters on the show it
18:47
wasn't
18:48
tokenistic it wasn't a
18:50
fetishized but I can't say the word
18:55
yeah
18:57
and reading interviews between both of
19:00
them they were so conscious of that as
19:03
well like the sitting down and the
19:06
Angles and what was going to be showing
19:07
and making sure that for both parties
19:11
the scene felt authentic and
19:15
was comfortable and was something that I
19:17
could be proud of as well and I think it
19:20
really just comes across
19:22
so strongly
19:25
I think quickly as well like one of the
19:27
as I touched on earlier really important
19:29
parts of this character is that they are
19:32
intersectional
19:34
um it's not this 2D ridiculous character
19:38
that doesn't actually exist in the real
19:40
world it's also somebody with you know
19:42
that's multiply marginalized you know
19:44
with real life experiences
19:47
um you know they're not just this I
19:50
guess
19:51
realistically like I said like that you
19:53
know Ultra palatable version of a
19:56
disabled person so you know it's a woman
19:58
of color who's also queer and they're
20:01
disabled and I'm like I don't know the
20:04
last time I saw that represented on
20:05
screen which is one something to be
20:09
celebrated it's amazing that they've
20:11
done this
20:12
to something to just be like distressed
20:16
and disappointed about that it is not
20:18
happening elsewhere like what you said
20:21
earlier Michelle we talk about this so
20:23
much where it's like even when there's
20:25
like faults with a disabled character
20:27
we're still so excited to see them and
20:30
when we like started scoring I feel like
20:32
in our first few episodes when we
20:34
started scoring on our inclusive
20:36
disability representation scale which
20:37
we'll get to soon when we first started
20:39
scoring we were scoring like so high for
20:41
stuff that I look back on and I'm like
20:43
that wasn't that good but it was just
20:45
because the bar was set so low
20:48
um and I think the bar is still set so
20:50
low because we still don't get that much
20:52
representation even with the show like
20:55
I'll play devil's advocate here
20:58
um but you know like there is only one
21:00
from what we're made aware of there is
21:03
only one disabled character
21:05
um in the in a diverse mix of characters
21:09
um and you know so we are sort of
21:11
placing all the representation onto this
21:13
one character
21:14
um the intersectionality is great I love
21:16
that I think that's great
21:18
um but yeah one character and I think
21:20
something else I would like to see a
21:23
little bit more of
21:25
um is her interacting with the rest of
21:28
the cost a bit more
21:29
um a lot of her scenes are just with
21:33
Micah the the boyfriend now
21:36
um or with the sister
21:38
um or her mother like in the family
21:40
setting I would love to see her interact
21:42
have more of like a friendship with like
21:44
the other
21:46
um women and um people in the mix
21:49
um and I think lastly what I would like
21:52
to see a bit more of and this is just
21:54
possibly for selfish reasons I'd like to
21:57
see her like how she accesses some
22:00
things like she magically like gets
22:02
inside these places I'm like is that
22:04
accessible is there a Rand post to get
22:07
in this place I don't know about that uh
22:09
just like and it doesn't have to be much
22:11
just like a little thing here and there
22:13
like just you know let's see how
22:16
actually no I will say we did see her
22:18
come through I think it was Micah's
22:20
front door
22:21
um said that was something but again
22:23
like was that like yeah just more of
22:26
that kind of little thing to be like
22:28
okay that's how she gets inside places
22:31
or that's how like she catches bosses or
22:35
she drives or she anything like that
22:37
just again I think this is the sad part
22:40
is that we're just clamoring on to like
22:43
whatever representation we can and be
22:46
like can you do it all can we and she's
22:48
a supporting character like I guess
22:50
where we're probably going is that like
22:52
and Julian Mercado probably would not
22:54
you know be angry about this but we want
22:58
her to be a main character like she is
23:00
an amazing character we're so ready for
23:03
more main characters that are people
23:05
with disability like it needs to happen
23:11
okay I think it's time to give our
23:14
scores on the inclusive disability
23:16
representation scale so for those who
23:19
are just joining us on this episode go
23:21
back and watch the rest but if you are
23:23
just joining us on this one inclusive
23:25
disability represent representation
23:26
scale if I can get the words out is a
23:30
made-up scale doesn't actually mean
23:31
anything in the grand scheme of the
23:33
world but five out of five is the best
23:35
ever zero or you know negative numbers
23:37
are tremendously bad disability
23:40
representation and we will start off
23:42
with Michelle so out of five what did
23:45
you give the L word gen queue
23:48
I'm going to be generous and I'm going
23:50
to give it a four love it
23:52
I just because it yeah as I said it was
23:55
just that moment of so many things that
23:58
have been missing in my life that just
24:01
sort of came together but I can still
24:04
see aspects that I want more of I want
24:07
as you're saying before I want more
24:10
dialogue I want more interaction with
24:12
other characters
24:14
and I think Jillian as an actress and
24:17
her character can definitely carry that
24:20
more staff
24:23
I mean
24:25
if you thought you were being generous
24:27
I'm gonna be extra generous I'm gonna
24:28
give it a four and a half oh my God out
24:30
of five
24:33
and like I just love her character
24:36
person with disabilities being shown in
24:39
a positive light in a romantic
24:42
relationship that's something that
24:45
um in an interview that Julian did
24:47
um you know she she did say she needs
24:50
she wants to see more
24:53
um disabled people being represented in
24:56
or shown in a positive light we want to
24:59
celebrate the joys of our lives and
25:01
because we we're well acquainted with
25:03
the negative narratives that we've all
25:06
been exposed to
25:07
um let's see the joy let's see the
25:08
positive let's see
25:10
um let's bring more of that to maybe
25:12
balance the scales a little bit more so
25:14
I gave it a four out of five so pretty
25:17
damn good score across the board I would
25:19
say for the web gen queue and for me
25:22
like pretty much agree with everything
25:24
the two of you said
25:26
um and for me it's just I am sick of
25:29
just one character like I think we can
25:30
have more than one disabled character on
25:32
a show
25:34
um I want to see the same character as
25:36
one of the main characters like we we
25:38
need that now we deserve that now like I
25:41
think shows can see that it's working as
25:44
well like when they do it right it works
25:46
and people respond to it really well I
25:49
would hope that they see you know the
25:50
more that Julian and Maribel are in in
25:53
the show the you know the ratings
25:55
improve and all that kind of stuff as
25:57
well but even because the whole business
25:59
case is very important as we talk about
26:01
but for me we just need more
26:04
um and and we can do more than just one
26:06
character so it'll be really interesting
26:07
to see if that happens in in season
26:10
three or Beyond so
26:13
well that is it for this week's episode
26:16
I want to thank you both for joining me
26:19
so so much and thank you everyone at
26:21
home who has listened and watched along
26:24
um we've loved having you we really want
26:26
to hear what you think about the L word
26:28
gen queue do you agree were we too
26:30
generous
26:32
um you know did you pick up on things
26:33
that we missed throughout the seasons um
26:37
and you know what are you excited I
26:38
guess about like us are you excited
26:40
about more representation in season
26:42
three and Beyond like are there little
26:44
tidbits that you want to see
26:47
um in maribel's I guess life as well
26:49
like I really want to see her at work
26:50
being a boss
26:52
um let us know so you can find us on
26:55
social media
26:56
um you can find us on Twitter Facebook
26:57
and Instagram if you just look up
26:59
Podcast reframed or reframed podcasts
27:02
um you'll find us and you can also send
27:04
us an email if that's better for you
27:06
we're hello at reframepodcast.com and
27:09
lastly I just want to say a huge thank
27:11
you to the community broadcast
27:13
foundation for helping to fund this
27:15
series
27:31
foreign
27:35
this has been a production of attitude
27:37
Foundation
27:43
[Applause]
27:43
[Music]
Continue listening
Episode 1 of 'ReFramed - Disability in Media' introduces Jason Clymo (series host) and co-hosts, Steph Dower and Robyn Lambird.
Special
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 1
•36 mins
Audio
The team chat with speaker and comedian Rose Callaghan and dissect TV series The Wrong Girl and the movie Wonder.
Rose Callaghan: 'The Wrong Girl' + 'Wonder'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 2
•33 mins
Audio
Features arts inclusivity champion Genevieve Clay-Smith and reviews of TV's Game of Thrones and movie Me Before You.
Genevieve Clay-Smith: 'Game of Thrones' + 'Me Before You'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 3
•33 mins
Audio
This episode: Ming Luo's experiences of being blind; disability representation in film The Fundamentals of Caring and TV's In the Dark.
Ming Luo: 'The Fundamentals of Caring' + 'In The Dark'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 4
•41 mins
Audio
This episode, Jason McCurry on disability and empowerment, and the team review TV series The Politician and film A Quiet Place.
Jason McCurry: 'The Politician' + 'A Quiet Place'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 5
•34 mins
Audio
Hosts Steph, Jason & Robyn review recent developments and discuss the Netfix show Sex Education and disability.
Jason Clymo - Sex Education
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 6
•26 mins
Audio
This week, transformative justice influencer K Shantel joins the team to discuss Marvel movie Eternals.
K Shantel: 'Eternals'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 7
•28 mins
Audio
This week: James Parr - model, triathlete, writer. We analyse how vintage children's film The Secret Garden shows disability.
James Parr: 'The Secret Garden'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 8
•25 mins
Audio
Movie The Peanut Butter Falcon is analysed through a disability-framing lens with special guest, human rights champion Graeme Innes.
Graeme Innes: 'The Peanut Butter Falcon'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 9
•27 mins
Audio
TV series The Witcher is assessed with special guest Catia Malaquias, human rights lawyer and disability advocate.
Catia Malaquias: 'The Witcher'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 10
•34 mins
Audio
Tobi Green Adenowo, UK activist and presenter, helps unpick disability representation in animated film Luca.
Tobi Green Adenowo: 'Luca'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 11
•39 mins
Audio
The team and personal/professional development specialist Carson Tueller analyse movie A Quiet Place Part 2.
Carson Tueller: 'A Quiet Place 2'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 12
•39 mins
Audio
Marvel's Hawkeye is put under a disability-critical eye by the team and special guest: film and TV specialist Tracey Vieira.
Tracey Vieira: 'Hawkeye'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 13
•39 mins
Audio
ReFramed takes on Enid Blyton - the TV adaptation of her Malory Towers discussed with author and activist Carly Findlay.
Carly Findlay: 'Malory Towers'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 14
•38 mins
Audio
Disability representation on TV's The Sex Lives of College Girls is unpacked - with model and communicator Rhiannon Tracey.
Rhiannon Tracey: 'The Sex Lives of College Girls'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 15
•29 mins
Audio
This week, fashion and screen inclusion advocate Angel Dixon helps examine disability representation in TV series Raising Dion.
Angel Dixon - 'Raising Dion'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 16
•51 mins
Audio
Writer, creator and activist Nina Tame joins the ReFramed team to analyse Disney favourite Finding Nemo.
Nina Tame: 'Finding Nemo'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 17
•39 mins
Audio
Akii Ngo - advocate, model, writer, consultant - brings a range of lived experiences and helps review the film Love and Other Drugs.
Akii Ngo: 'Love and Other Drugs'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 18
•45 mins
Audio
Greens Senator Jordon Steele-John helps the team analyse the film Run from the viewpoint of disability presentation.
Senator Jordon Steele-John: 'Run'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 19
•27 mins
Audio
Model, actor and activist Maya Dove helps the team to analyse hilarious TV show Derry Girls.
Maya Dove: 'Derry Girls'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 20
•27 mins
Audio
Michelle Roger - writer, artist, photographer, model - joins the team to discuss TV show The L Word Gen Q.
Michelle Roger: 'The L Word Gen Q'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 21
•27 mins
Audio
Rebooted TV series Queer as Folk goes under the disability lens with the team - joined by businessman and advocate Luke Christian.
Luke Christian: Queer as Folk (2022)
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 22
•27 mins
Audio
Writer, digital creator and advocate Annie Segarra helps the team review animated TV series Dead End: Paranormal Park.
Annie Segarra: 'Dead End: Paranormal Park'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 23
•27 mins
Audio
TV's Heartbreak High is assessed through a disability lens with Anja Christofferson, advocate and social entrepreneur.
Anja Christoffersen: 'Heartbreak High'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 24
•27 mins
Audio
The team is joined by writer, actor, producer and activist Emily Dash - to review TV series Switched At Birth.
Emily Dash: 'Switched At Birth'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 25
•27 mins
Audio